About · Review methodology

How we review crypto casinos

Every casino on our rankings was reviewed against the same scored rubric. Reviewers fund a real account, deposit on at least one of BTC, SOL or USDT, play through a minimum bankroll, request a withdrawal, time it, and score the operator across seven weighted categories. Here's the full breakdown.

Scoring rubric

1. Payout speed (25%)

   We time a real withdrawal end-to-end on BTC, SOL and USDT-TRC20. Anything over 1 hour loses points; under 5 minutes scores full marks.

2. Licensing & track record (20%)

   Valid licence (Curaçao GCB, Anjouan, Isle of Man, MGA), no payout-refusal history in player forums over the past 18 months.

3. Provably fair & RTP transparency (15%)

   Are originals provably fair? Are slot RTPs published? Is there a verifier in the bet history?

4. Bonus value & terms (15%)

   We compute real EV, not headline percentage. 50x wagering on a 300% match scores worse than 30x on 100%.

5. Game library (10%)

   Provider count, originals quality, live dealer depth, sportsbook breadth where applicable.

6. Deposit / withdrawal methods (10%)

   BTC, ETH, SOL, USDT, LTC all supported; Lightning bonus; instant on-ramp; reasonable minimums.

7. Support & UX (5%)

   Response time on live chat, mobile usability, account UX, no dark patterns at withdrawal.

What disqualifies a casino entirely

• • Documented pattern of refused or stalled payouts in the past 18 months.
• • No valid licence or auditable corporate entity.
• • Predatory bonus terms (e.g. retroactive max-bet voids, sticky bonus on cashout).
• • No provably fair option and no third-party RNG audit.
• • Closes accounts to avoid paying confirmed winners.

Re-review cadence

Every ranked operator is re-scored every 90 days. Bonus terms, withdrawal times and licence status get re-verified, and the table re-orders accordingly. We publish "last reviewed" dates on each casino page.